The report, authored by the Commission of the HISD Takeover, also advocates for establishing clear limits on the authority of state-appointed boards and superintendents, as well as the education commissioner. The commission suggests that the state should create local processes for ending a takeover, including the possibility of a community referendum.
The commission, which was self-established by its members, argues that state takeovers can diminish curriculum, sever relationships between students and families, and degrade financial stewardship. The report details qualitative impacts based on over 100 collected accounts, which the commission believes offer a fuller picture than quantitative data alone.
Currently, the state can intervene if a campus fails its accountability ratings for five consecutive years. The commission proposes raising this threshold to a broader "pattern of underperformance" across a larger portion of a district, arguing the current standard "unfairly burdens" larger districts.
The report also addresses the process for ending a state takeover, noting that there is no clear path to exit once an intervention begins. The commission recommends requiring local referendums before a takeover can be extended, giving communities a say in its continuation.
While the commission highlights negative impacts, the district stated that its transformation is delivering measurable results for students and families, pointing to improvements in accountability ratings and increased investment in instruction.
